Ann Randolph

32 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Ann Randolph
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Nephrology 356
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 430
  • Cancer Research 290
  • Oncology 459
  • Clinical Biochemistry 76
Replace R. Clay Bunn with:
R. Clay Bunn United States
Toshiaki Monkawa Japan
Christophe A. Girard United Kingdom
Michelle L. Nieman United States
Daisuke Ogawa Japan
Craig B. Woda United States
Athanasios Didangelos United Kingdom
Chun Guo China
Yasunori Shintani Japan
Michael P. Czubryt Canada
Ann Randolph relative to R. Clay Bunn United States R. Clay Bunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
R. Clay Bunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Randolph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Randolph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Randolph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Randolph more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Randolph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Randolph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Randolph. The network helps show where Ann Randolph may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Randolph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Randolph Line = papers co-authored together Ann Randolph links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002230
2 2007208
3 1999196
4 2002173
5 2012143
6 2013130
7 2014127
8 2013125
9
Insulin-like growth factor I receptor prevents apoptosis and enhances neuroblastoma tumorigenesis.
1996119
10 2014111
11 1996104
12 200554
13 200553
14 199553
15 200951
16 200447
17 200545
18
In vitro proliferation of endothelial cells from kitten retinal capillaries.
197940
19 201335
20 199131

About Ann Randolph

Ann Randolph is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (356 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (430 citations), Cancer Research (290 citations), Oncology (459 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (76 citations). Ann Randolph has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eva L. Feldman, Giancarlo Marra, C. Richard Boland, Matthias Kretzler, Luigi Laghi, Viji Nair, J. Robinson Singleton, Robert G. Nelson, James V. Neel and D P Chauhan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Diabetes, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact