Ann M. Mitchell

3.9k citations
154 papers · 2.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ann M. Mitchell

137 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Ann M. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Research and Theory 64
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • General Health Professions 582
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 67
  • Leadership and Management 23
Replace Esther Chang with:
Esther Chang Australia
Kathleen R. Delaney United States
Ayman M. Hamdan‐Mansour Jordan
Joanne Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Jenny Firth‐Cozens United Kingdom
Sara Carmel Israel
Pirkko Routasalo Finland
Niels Buus Denmark
Mona Kihlgren Sweden
Kim Foster Australia
Ann M. Mitchell relative to Esther Chang Australia Esther Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Esther Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann M. Mitchell. The network helps show where Ann M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann M. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Ann M. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996268
2 2008217
3 2004186
4 2010173
5 2008163
6 2005133
7 2005112
8 200973
9 201270
10 200258
11 201357
12 200856
13 199853
14 200348
15 200943
16 199641
17 201639
18 201337
19 200633
20 201831

About Ann M. Mitchell

Ann M. Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 154 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (27 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (19 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (15 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (14 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (8 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (64 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (582 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (67 citations) and Leadership and Management (23 citations). Ann M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Yookyung Kim, Holly G. Prigerson, Kirstyn Kameg, Patricia B. Crane, Valerie Howard, Jannette M. McMenamy, John R. Jordan, John M. Clochesy, Kathryn Puskar and Holly Hagle. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Abuse, Nurse Educator, Journal of Emergency Nursing, Nursing Outlook and Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact