Ann Kent

538 citations
24 papers · 278 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ann Kent

19 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Ann Kent
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Development 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 223
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21
  • Law 21
Replace Peter Van Ness with:
Peter Van Ness United States
Robert Cooper United States
Surya P. Subedi United Kingdom
Saul H. Mendlovitz United States
Deborah L. Norden United States
Heiko Knobel Germany
Konstantinos D. Magliveras Greece
Benjamin J. Appel United States
Conway W. Henderson United States
Brian Urquhart United States
Ann Kent relative to Peter Van Ness United States Peter Van Ness's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Peter Van Ness · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Kent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Kent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Kent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Kent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Kent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Kent. The network helps show where Ann Kent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ann Kent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Kent Line = papers co-authored together Ann Kent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199964
2 200255
3 200754
4 199531
5 200115
6
Compliance v Cooperation: China and International Law
200610
7 19917
8 19976
9 19815
10 20145
11 20085
12 19965
13 19923
14 20193
15 20163
16 19972
17 20042
18 20081
19 20021
20 20151

About Ann Kent

Ann Kent is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, History and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 24 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (9 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (5 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers) and Human Rights and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (68 citations), Political Science and International Relations (223 citations), Sociology and Political Science (135 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (21 citations) and Law (21 citations). Ann Kent has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include John M. Hobson, Richard Leaver and Derek McDougall. Their work appears in journals such as Human Rights Quarterly, Pacific Affairs, The China Quarterly, Asian Studies Review and Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact