Ann Johnson

48 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers

Ann Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 113
  • General Psychology 52
  • History and Philosophy of Science 50
  • Hematology 66
  • Oncology 139
Replace Víctor B. Penchaszadeh with:
Víctor B. Penchaszadeh United States
Diane Β. Paul United States
Ryan Schofield United States
Philip R. Reilly United States
Barbara Johnson United States
Ronald Fletcher United States
R. Bell United Kingdom
Jonathan Turner United Kingdom
Martin Hewitt United Kingdom
Christine Jacobsen Switzerland
Ann Johnson relative to Víctor B. Penchaszadeh United States Víctor B. Penchaszadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Víctor B. Penchaszadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Johnson. The network helps show where Ann Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Ann Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008201
2 1999153
3 201147
4 200829
5 199525
6 202124
7 200922
8 200722
9
The End of Pure Science: Science Policy from Bayh-Dole to the NNI
200421
10 200020
11 201720
12 200917
13 200917
14
National identity : the role of science and technology
200917
15 201013
16 200913
17 199513
18 200613
19 199410
20 200510

About Ann Johnson

Ann Johnson is a scholar working on Oncology, History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cancer Research, having authored 53 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (3 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (113 citations), General Psychology (52 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations), Hematology (66 citations) and Oncology (139 citations). Ann Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ann S. O’Malley, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Jon Kerner, Elizabeth Johnston, Bita Arabshahi, Anne Marie Cahill, Deborah M. Zarnow, Chris Feudtner, Pamela F. Weiss and Larissa T. Bilaniuk. Their work appears in journals such as History of Psychology, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Science & Technology Studies, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Perspectives on Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact