Ann Heesters

521 citations
23 papers · 271 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ann Heesters

21 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Ann Heesters
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health Informatics 31
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 160
  • General Health Professions 134
  • Clinical Psychology 76
  • Pharmacy 10
Replace Lydia S. Dugdale with:
Lydia S. Dugdale United States
Iain Brassington United Kingdom
Noah Crampton Canada
Ben Clark United Kingdom
Milou Silkens Netherlands
Megan Milota Netherlands
Latrina Y. Prince United States
Joschka Haltaufderheide Germany
Ragan DuBose-Morris United States
Joshua Erhabor United Kingdom
Ann Heesters relative to Lydia S. Dugdale United States Lydia S. Dugdale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Lydia S. Dugdale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Heesters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Heesters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Heesters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Heesters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Heesters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Heesters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Heesters. The network helps show where Ann Heesters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Heesters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Heesters Line = papers co-authored together Ann Heesters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017100
2 202443
3 202118
4 202218
5 202215
6 20249
7 20168
8 20207
9 20217
10 20216
11 20166
12 20236
13 20216
14 20155
15 20124
16 20134
17 20122
18 20192
19 20232
20 20201

About Ann Heesters

Ann Heesters is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (12 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (160 citations), General Health Professions (134 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations) and Pharmacy (10 citations). Ann Heesters has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gary Rodin, Michael Gardam, Gerald O’Leary, Madeline Li, Sarah Watt, Fei‐Fei Liu, Breffni Hannon, Srinivas Raman, Nazanin Fallah‐Rad and Ernie Mak. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, JAMA Oncology, BMJ Open, ESMO Open and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact