Anke Mothes
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 9
- Surgery 7
- Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions 2
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 2
- Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Ingo B. Runnebaum (23 shared papers)Marc P. Radosa (20 shared papers)Oumar Camara (6 shared papers)Herbert Diebolder (6 shared papers)Henning Mothes (7 shared papers)A. Altendorf-Hofmann (2 shared papers)J Jiménez Cruz (4 shared papers)Julia Caroline Radosa (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Anke Mothes
30 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 107
- Reproductive Medicine 90
- Rheumatology 103
- Urology 17
- Surgery 107
Countries citing papers authored by Anke Mothes
This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Mothes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Mothes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Mothes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Mothes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Mothes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Mothes. The network helps show where Anke Mothes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke Mothes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 3 |
About Anke Mothes
Anke Mothes is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (107 citations), Reproductive Medicine (90 citations), Rheumatology (103 citations), Urology (17 citations) and Surgery (107 citations). Anke Mothes has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and France. Frequent co-authors include Ingo B. Runnebaum, Marc P. Radosa, Oumar Camara, Herbert Diebolder, Henning Mothes, A. Altendorf-Hofmann, J Jiménez Cruz, Julia Caroline Radosa, Winfried Meißner and Ingolf Juhasz-Böess. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer and Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.