Anja Schroeter

407 citations
9 papers · 276 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Anja Schroeter

9 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Anja Schroeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Modeling and Simulation 29
  • Genetics 99
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 89
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 44
Replace N. Leahy with:
N. Leahy United States
Laura De Vargas Roditi Switzerland
Ming Ma China
Thomas J. Roberts United States
Jacob Bock Axelsen United States
K. Kawasaki Japan
Katherine A. Riccione United States
Qi Zheng United States
Alan J. Terry United Kingdom
Lucas M. Stolerman United States
Anja Schroeter relative to N. Leahy United States N. Leahy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
N. Leahy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anja Schroeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anja Schroeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anja Schroeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anja Schroeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anja Schroeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anja Schroeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anja Schroeter. The network helps show where Anja Schroeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Anja Schroeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anja Schroeter Line = papers co-authored together Anja Schroeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201486
2 200852
3 201433
4 201231
5 201131
6 201030
7 20126
8 20134
9 20143

About Anja Schroeter

Anja Schroeter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (2 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (2 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (1 paper) and Protein purification and stability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (29 citations), Genetics (99 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (89 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (44 citations). Anja Schroeter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Schuster, Günter Theißen, Stefan Schuster, Jan‐Ulrich Kreft, Sarah Werner, David Basanta, Katrin Bohl, Andreas Deutsch, Thomas Pfeiffer and Luís F. de Figueiredo. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular BioSystems, Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, Biotechnology Journal, Frontiers in Microbiology and Biofouling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact