Anitha Thomas

623 citations
57 papers · 367 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anitha Thomas

47 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Anitha Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 42
  • Reproductive Medicine 36
  • Dermatology 31
  • Physiology 14
  • Epidemiology 88
Replace Yankui Wang with:
Yankui Wang China
Eve M. Roth United States
J. Wolf United States
Yasuki Sakamoto Japan
Christian Dannecker Germany
Xiaochuan Xie China
Mukund Sable India
Kana Wang China
Agata Surdacka Poland
Xiaojie Fang China
Anitha Thomas relative to Yankui Wang China Yankui Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Yankui Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anitha Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anitha Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anitha Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anitha Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anitha Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anitha Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anitha Thomas. The network helps show where Anitha Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anitha Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anitha Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Anitha Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201390
2 201244
3 201238
4 200721
5 201518
6 197917
7 202115
8 201111
9 19739
10 20236
11 20156
12 20165
13 20235
14 20195
15 20195
16 20234
17 20234
18 20214
19 20204
20 20144

About Anitha Thomas

Anitha Thomas is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (42 citations), Reproductive Medicine (36 citations), Dermatology (31 citations), Physiology (14 citations) and Epidemiology (88 citations). Anitha Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in India, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick J. Bradley, Abraham Peedicayil, Rachel Chandy, Michel Roberge, Natalia Zisman, Elizabeth Donohue, Hilary Anderson, Marcel B. Bally, Sylvia S. W. Ng and Murray S. Webb. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, Pathology and Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact