Andy Luse

49 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Andy Luse
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 135
  • Information Systems and Management 93
  • Communication 72
  • Computer Science Applications 55
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 75
Replace Thea van der Geest with:
Thea van der Geest Netherlands
Georgios Dafoulas United Kingdom
Ebba Þóra Hvannberg Iceland
Kathrin Figl Austria
Heinrich Schwarz United States
Christine T. Wolf United States
Alanah Davis United States
Carol M. Barnum United States
Rex Hartson United States
Michael Prilla Germany
Andy Luse relative to Thea van der Geest Netherlands Thea van der Geest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Thea van der Geest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andy Luse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andy Luse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andy Luse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andy Luse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andy Luse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andy Luse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andy Luse. The network helps show where Andy Luse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Andy Luse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andy Luse Line = papers co-authored together Andy Luse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201584
2 201353
3 200941
4 201638
5 201637
6 201435
7 201234
8 201434
9 201233
10 201421
11 202016
12 202314
13 200713
14 202012
15 201112
16 202111
17 20219
18
The Determinants of Acceptance of Recommender Systems: Applying the UTAUT Model
20128
19 20188
20 20138

About Andy Luse

Andy Luse is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Human-Computer Interaction and Communication, having authored 52 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (10 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers), Information and Cyber Security (6 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (135 citations), Information Systems and Management (93 citations), Communication (72 citations), Computer Science Applications (55 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (75 citations). Andy Luse has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Brian E. Mennecke, Anthony M. Townsend, Doug Jacobson, Stephen B. Gilbert, Judy M. Vance, Anicia Peters, Samuel M. Demarie, David Biros, James C. McElroy and Shu Z. Schiller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Decision Support Systems and IEEE Transactions on Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact