Andrew van Bommel

863 citations
18 papers · 785 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew van Bommel

18 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Andrew van Bommel
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Automotive Engineering 256
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 217
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 663
  • Mechanical Engineering 239
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 41
Replace Ni Yang with:
Ni Yang China
Hélène Rouault France
Gregory V. Chase United States
Simon Wiemers‐Meyer Germany
Julien Fullenwarth France
Yourong Wang China
D.P. Boden United States
Valentina Dall’Asta Italy
Irina Profatilova France
Brian Burrows United States
Andrew van Bommel relative to Ni Yang China Ni Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Ni Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew van Bommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew van Bommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew van Bommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew van Bommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew van Bommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew van Bommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew van Bommel. The network helps show where Andrew van Bommel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Andrew van Bommel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew van Bommel Line = papers co-authored together Andrew van Bommel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2009227
2 2009113
3 200982
4 201181
5 201275
6 201053
7 201051
8 200530
9 200420
10 200416
11 202216
12 200511
13 20064
14 20092
15 20081
16 20241
17 20081
18
Lithium-Rich Transition Metal Oxides as Positive Electrode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries
20101

About Andrew van Bommel

Andrew van Bommel is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Automotive Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 18 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Battery Materials (10 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (7 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (5 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (5 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (3 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (2 papers), Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (2 papers) and Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (256 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (217 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (663 citations), Mechanical Engineering (239 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (41 citations). Andrew van Bommel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. R. Dahn, Ranjith Divigalpitiya, Fu Zhou, Xuemei Zhao, L. J. Krause, R. Palepu, Aaron Rowe, Xin Xia, Karen M. Glenn and Subhash C. Bhattacharya. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Colloid & Polymer Science, Chemistry of Materials, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and Canadian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact