Andrew Reece
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 3
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 5
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher M. Danforth (1 shared paper)Ellen J. Langer (3 shared papers)Francesco Pagnini (3 shared papers)Deborah Phillips (3 shared papers)Gus Cooney (2 shared papers)Roy F. Baumeister (5 shared papers)Martin E. P. Seligman (2 shared papers)Erica J. Boothby (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Positive Psychology (2 papers)Psychology and Health (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (1 paper)Emotion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Reece
16 papers receiving 606 citations
Andrew Reece's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Applied Psychology 141
- Health Informatics 17
- Social Psychology 236
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
- Clinical Psychology 100
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Reece
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Reece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Reece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Reece more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Reece
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Reece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Reece. The network helps show where Andrew Reece may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Reece, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 354 |
| 2 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 |
About Andrew Reece
Andrew Reece is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (141 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Social Psychology (236 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations) and Clinical Psychology (100 citations). Andrew Reece has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher M. Danforth, Ellen J. Langer, Francesco Pagnini, Deborah Phillips, Gus Cooney, Roy F. Baumeister, Martin E. P. Seligman, Erica J. Boothby, David B. Yaden and Barry Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Positive Psychology, Psychology and Health, PLoS ONE, Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports and Emotion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.