Andrew Erman

12 papers receiving 715 citations

Andrew Erman's Hit Papers

Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality 1993 · 587 citations
5870+11+22Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Andrew Erman
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Speech and Hearing 179
  • Physiology 495
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
  • Otorhinolaryngology 41
  • Signal Processing 50
Replace P.H.O. Dejonckere with:
P.H.O. Dejonckere Belgium
Gwen Van Nuffelen Belgium
B. Millet Netherlands
Deirdre D. Michael United States
Louis Heylen Belgium
T. Hacki Germany
Ruth Epstein United Kingdom
M. Nasser Kotby Egypt
Jan Raes Belgium
Leonardo Wanderley Lopes Brazil
Andrew Erman relative to P.H.O. Dejonckere Belgium P.H.O. Dejonckere's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P.H.O. Dejonckere · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Erman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Erman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Erman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Erman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Erman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Erman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Erman. The network helps show where Andrew Erman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Erman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Erman Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Erman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality
Hit paper breakdown →
1993587
2 201375
3 200838
4 201713
5 20148
6 20137
7 20107
8 20216
9 20154
10 20194
11 20182
12 20182

About Andrew Erman

Andrew Erman is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Physiology, Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Oncology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (5 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (4 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (1 paper), Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (179 citations), Physiology (495 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (231 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (41 citations) and Signal Processing (50 citations). Andrew Erman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce R. Gerratt, Gerald S. Berke, Jody Kreiman, Gail B. Kempster, Dinesh K. Chhetri, Victor M. Duarte, Marilene B. Wang, Yuan F. Liu, Nausheen Jamal and Keith E. Blackwell. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, The Laryngoscope, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, American Journal of Otolaryngology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact