Andrew E. Denker

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Andrew E. Denker
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 237
  • Rheumatology 332
  • Urology 75
  • Genetics 127
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 179
Replace R.L. van Bezooijen with:
R.L. van Bezooijen Netherlands
Toshinori Ishizuya Japan
Joseph A. Lorenzo United States
Peter R. Elford Switzerland
Konosuke Nakayama Japan
Kyeong‐Sook Lee South Korea
Yoshinari Kumagai United States
Erik R. Sampson United States
Joseph A. Tamasi United States
Ryotaro Iwasaki Japan
Andrew E. Denker relative to R.L. van Bezooijen Netherlands R.L. van Bezooijen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
R.L. van Bezooijen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Denker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Denker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Denker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Denker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Denker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Denker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Denker. The network helps show where Andrew E. Denker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Denker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew E. Denker Line = papers co-authored together Andrew E. Denker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999220
2 1995181
3 2012139
4 2018123
5 202073
6 200555
7 200546
8 201436
9 202034
10 202127
11 201726
12 201521
13 201018
14 202417
15 201415
16 201112
17 201511
18 201311
19
Odanacatib does not influence the single dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.
20138
20 20128

About Andrew E. Denker

Andrew E. Denker is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Oncology, Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Immunology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and treatments (7 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies (3 papers), Complement system in diseases (3 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (237 citations), Rheumatology (332 citations), Urology (75 citations), Genetics (127 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (179 citations). Andrew E. Denker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Steven B. Nicoll, Rocky S. Tuan, Andrew R. Haas, Michael P. Whyte, Priya Sunil Kishnani, Scott Moseley, Frank Rauch, Eric J. Watsky, Elizabeth Rosenberg and ALBERT T. LEUNG. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Bone, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Osteoporosis International and Differentiation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact