Andrew Coates

508 citations
29 papers · 267 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Coates

26 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Andrew Coates
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 125
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 98
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 33
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
Replace Nicholas Smith with:
Nicholas Smith United States
Roberto González Chile
Alexander S. Blum Germany
David I. Dunsky United States
R. A. White United States
Rafael M. Rubio Spain
Young‐Jong Sohn South Korea
Ryuichi Takahashi Japan
Juan C. Toledo-Roy Mexico
Domenico Fiorenza Italy
Andrew Coates relative to Nicholas Smith United States Nicholas Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Nicholas Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Coates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Coates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Coates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Coates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Coates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Coates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Coates. The network helps show where Andrew Coates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Coates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Coates Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Coates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198134
2 201132
3 201823
4 200518
5 202315
6 201914
7 202214
8 201712
9 200710
10 201810
11 201010
12 202110
13 20238
14 19987
15 20097
16 20186
17 20166
18 20175
19 20105
20 20234

About Andrew Coates

Andrew Coates is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Surgery, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (1 paper) and Inertial Sensor and Navigation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (125 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (98 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (33 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (5 citations). Andrew Coates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fethi M. Ramazanoğlu, Thomas P. Sotiriou, Sebastian H. Völkel, Kostas D. Kokkotas, A. Emir Gümrükçüoğlu, Beatrice Kovasznay, Michael Horbatsch, Daniel Griffiths-King, Peter E. Hall and S.J. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Biosensors and Bioelectronics X, Classical and Quantum Gravity and Mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact