Andrew C. Faust

32 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Andrew C. Faust
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 75
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
  • Internal Medicine 28
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 39
  • Molecular Medicine 28
Replace William Peppard with:
William Peppard United States
James M. Hollands United States
Stéphane Guyomarch France
Heather A. Personett United States
Chad A. Knoderer United States
Robert Palmér United States
Jerry Altshuler United States
Melanie Smith United States
Sofia Medvedev United States
John Sherner United States
Andrew C. Faust relative to William Peppard United States William Peppard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
William Peppard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew C. Faust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew C. Faust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew C. Faust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew C. Faust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew C. Faust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew C. Faust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew C. Faust. The network helps show where Andrew C. Faust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew C. Faust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew C. Faust Line = papers co-authored together Andrew C. Faust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 201455
3 201653
4 201934
5 201629
6 201420
7 201118
8 201714
9 201514
10 201812
11 200511
12 201510
13 20189
14 20148
15 20207
16 20116
17 20176
18 20235
19 20224
20 20174

About Andrew C. Faust

Andrew C. Faust is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (75 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations), Internal Medicine (28 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (39 citations) and Molecular Medicine (28 citations). Andrew C. Faust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Edward L. Goodman, Laura J. Knoll, Carlos A. Álvarez, Ann K. Wittkowsky, William C. Putnam, James A. McKinnell, Darrel W. Hughes, Lucas Elijovich, Christopher K. Finch and Rebecca L. Attridge. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Emergency Medicine, Critical Care Nurse and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact