Andrew Botros
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 4
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 1
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 2
- Video Analysis and Summarization 1
- Co-authors
- Colleen Psarros (3 shared papers)Bas van Dijk (2 shared papers)Matthijs Killian (1 shared paper)Joe Wolfe (3 shared papers)John R. Lindsay Smith (3 shared papers)Thomas Wesarg (1 shared paper)Erwin Offeciers (1 shared paper)Matthias Hey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ear and Hearing (3 papers)Australian Journal of Public Administration (1 paper)Journal of New Music Research (1 paper)Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (1 paper)International Journal of Audiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Andrew Botros
9 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Sensory Systems 74
- Cognitive Neuroscience 240
- Otorhinolaryngology 14
- Speech and Hearing 20
- Signal Processing 37
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Botros
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Botros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Botros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Botros more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Botros
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Botros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Botros. The network helps show where Andrew Botros may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Botros, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 7 | THE VIRTUAL BOEHM FLUTE — A WEB SERVICE THAT PREDICTS MULTIPHONICS, MICROTONES AND ALTERNATIVE FINGERINGS | 2002 | 8 |
| 8 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 9 | THE 'VIRTUAL FLUTE': ACOUSTIC MODELLING AT THE SERVICE OF PLAYERS AND COMPOSERS | 2003 | 2 |
About Andrew Botros
Andrew Botros is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Political Science and International Relations and Information Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (1 paper), Video Analysis and Summarization (1 paper), Smart Cities and Technologies (1 paper), Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper) and Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (240 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (14 citations), Speech and Hearing (20 citations) and Signal Processing (37 citations). Andrew Botros has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Colleen Psarros, Bas van Dijk, Matthijs Killian, Joe Wolfe, John R. Lindsay Smith, Thomas Wesarg, Erwin Offeciers, Matthias Hey, André Morsnowski and Roland Laszig. Their work appears in journals such as Ear and Hearing, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Journal of New Music Research, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and International Journal of Audiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.