Andreas Kleefeld

38 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Andreas Kleefeld
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Mathematical Physics 133
  • Statistics and Probability 67
  • Management Science and Operations Research 46
  • Numerical Analysis 19
  • Finance 35
Replace Yat Tin Chow with:
Yat Tin Chow United States
Federico Polito Italy
Franklin Mendivil Canada
G. A. Mikhaı̆lov Russia
В. В. Сазонов Russia
Yukio Ogura Japan
Aimé Lachal France
Alfred Schöttl Germany
Leonid Koralov United States
Yulong Lu United States
Andreas Kleefeld relative to Yat Tin Chow United States Yat Tin Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Yat Tin Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Kleefeld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Kleefeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Kleefeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Kleefeld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Kleefeld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Kleefeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Kleefeld. The network helps show where Andreas Kleefeld may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Kleefeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Kleefeld Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Kleefeld links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201538
2 201035
3 201334
4 201922
5 201317
6 201016
7 201815
8 201615
9 202012
10 201812
11 201812
12 201310
13 20218
14 20198
15 20148
16 20128
17 20127
18 20127
19 20127
20
Folded- and Log-Folded-t Distributions as Models for Insurance Loss Data
20095

About Andreas Kleefeld

Andreas Kleefeld is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical methods in inverse problems (20 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (11 papers), Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis (10 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (9 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (7 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (4 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (133 citations), Statistics and Probability (67 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (46 citations), Numerical Analysis (19 citations) and Finance (35 citations). Andreas Kleefeld has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Vytaras Brazauskas, Bernhard Burgeth, Jesús Martín Vaquero, Antonios Charalambopoulos, Andreas Kirsch, Nicolas Passat, Benoît Naegel, Bruce A. Wade, Stella Gypser and Werner B. Herppich. Their work appears in journals such as Inverse Problems, Inverse Problems and Imaging, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Journal of Computational Physics and Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact