Andreas Hoeft

67 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Andreas Hoeft
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 910
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 485
  • Developmental Neuroscience 273
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 793
  • Emergency Medicine 273
Replace L. Lindgren with:
L. Lindgren Finland
Harry J. M. Lemmens United States
Michael F. James South Africa
Lawrence J. Saidman United States
James M. Bailey United States
Andrew Bowdle United States
P. Duvaldestin France
Markku Hynynen Finland
Peter H. Tonner Germany
I. Murat France
Andreas Hoeft relative to L. Lindgren Finland L. Lindgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
L. Lindgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Hoeft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Hoeft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Hoeft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Hoeft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Hoeft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Hoeft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Hoeft. The network helps show where Andreas Hoeft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Hoeft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Hoeft Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Hoeft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000282
2 2014257
3 2003226
4 2000165
5 1994152
6 2002146
7 2015137
8 2015123
9 2000123
10 2001114
11 2001101
12 199171
13 201962
14 199962
15 200562
16 200062
17 200159
18 200156
19 199950
20 199648

About Andreas Hoeft

Andreas Hoeft is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (18 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (14 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (10 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (9 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (910 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (485 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (273 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (793 citations) and Emergency Medicine (273 citations). Andreas Hoeft has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Heiko Röpcke, Jörgen Bruhn, Thomas Bouillon, Frank Stüber, Christian Putensen, Hermann Wrigge, Benno Rehberg, Jörg Zinserling, Paolo Pelosi and Rudolf Hering. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Basic Research in Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact