Peter H. Tonner

116 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Peter H. Tonner
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 860
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 423
  • Developmental Neuroscience 364
  • Emergency Medicine 205
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 479
Replace J. G. Reves with:
J. G. Reves United States
Benoît Plaud France
P. Duvaldestin France
A Matsuki Japan
Jeffrey B. Gross United States
Julien F. Biebuyck United States
John H. Tinker United States
Mark H. Zornow United States
Jayant K. Deshpande United States
Barbara W. Brandom United States
Peter H. Tonner relative to J. G. Reves United States J. G. Reves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
J. G. Reves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Tonner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Tonner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Tonner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Tonner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Tonner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Tonner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Tonner. The network helps show where Peter H. Tonner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter H. Tonner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter H. Tonner Line = papers co-authored together Peter H. Tonner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005175
2 2005121
3 200599
4 200594
5 200694
6 200585
7 201779
8 200677
9 200376
10 200470
11 200667
12 200666
13 200564
14 199464
15 200763
16 200463
17 200762
18 200060
19 199260
20 200359

About Peter H. Tonner

Peter H. Tonner is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Developmental Neuroscience and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 124 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (60 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (25 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (21 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (7 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (860 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (423 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (364 citations), Emergency Medicine (205 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (479 citations). Peter H. Tonner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jens Scholz, Andrea Paris, Berthold Bein, Markus Steinfath, Keith W. Miller, Jochen Schulte am Esch, Erol Cavus, Martin Bauer, Thomas Ledowski and Lutz Hein. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology and Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact