André Stork

102 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

André Stork
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 246
  • Human-Computer Interaction 249
  • Geology 187
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 483
  • Space and Planetary Science 30
Replace Tom DeFanti with:
Tom DeFanti United States
Michael Gervautz Austria
Simon Su United States
Paul Asente United States
Denis Kalkofen Austria
Kyungeun Cho South Korea
Heedong Ko South Korea
Jerry O. Talton United States
Dirk Reiners United States
Doantam Phan United States
André Stork relative to Tom DeFanti United States Tom DeFanti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Tom DeFanti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by André Stork

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of André Stork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Stork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Stork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by André Stork

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Stork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Stork. The network helps show where André Stork may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside André Stork, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with André Stork Line = papers co-authored together André Stork links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200366
2 201265
3 200055
4 201353
5 200741
6 201240
7 201335
8 199632
9 200729
10 199425
11 201520
12 201220
13 199718
14 201118
15 201117
16 200417
17 201216
18 199815
19 202015
20 201515

About André Stork

André Stork is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Mechanics, Geology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 111 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (40 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (29 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (23 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (20 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (17 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (16 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (15 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (246 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (249 citations), Geology (187 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (483 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (30 citations). André Stork has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Dieter W. Fellner, Pedro Santos, Daniel Weber, Raffaele De Amicis, L. Miguel Encarnação, Michele Fiorentino, Oliver Bimber, Giuseppe Monno, Jan Bender and Michael Goesele. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, The Visual Computer, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications and International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact