André Smıth

30 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

André Smıth
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
  • Health 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 156
  • General Health Professions 166
  • Periodontics 28
Replace Amy Restorick Roberts with:
Amy Restorick Roberts United States
Lynne Corner United Kingdom
Nancy J. Karlin United States
Qingsong Chang China
Rifky Tkatch United States
Solveig Hauge Norway
Said Shahtahmasebi New Zealand
Myles-Jay Linton United Kingdom
Beth Mastel‐Smith United States
Kezia Scales United States
André Smıth relative to Amy Restorick Roberts United States Amy Restorick Roberts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Amy Restorick Roberts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by André Smıth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of André Smıth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Smıth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Smıth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by André Smıth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Smıth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Smıth. The network helps show where André Smıth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside André Smıth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with André Smıth Line = papers co-authored together André Smıth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007147
2 2014130
3 201182
4 201454
5 200151
6 201838
7
Somatization and psychologization: Understanding cultural idioms of distress.
199836
8 201331
9
Blood Donation and Community: Exploring the Influence of Social Capital *
201128
10 202124
11 201921
12 201318
13 199613
14 201413
15 201111
16 20119
17 20196
18 20226
19 20185
20 20225

About André Smıth

André Smıth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Music Therapy and Health (5 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Health (90 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations), General Health Professions (166 citations) and Periodontics (28 citations). André Smıth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neena L. Chappell, Carren Dujela, Karen Kobayashi, B. Lynn Beattie, Denise Cloutier, Martha Donnelly, Ralph Matthews, Jeff Small, Deborah O’Connor and Alison Phinney. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Journal of Aging Studies, Aging & Mental Health, Innovation in Aging and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact