André Lopes

641 citations
30 papers · 226 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 5
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 2
    • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 9
    • Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4

André Lopes

26 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

André Lopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 81
  • Reproductive Medicine 81
  • Oncology 83
  • Surgery 97
  • Dermatology 14
Replace Thomas Hébert with:
Thomas Hébert France
Oriol Puig Spain
Jean Cady France
Mariano Catello Di Donna Italy
Varol Gülseren Türkiye
Shabber Zaveri India
F Marocco Italy
Glenn E. Bigsby United States
M Pavlov Serbia
Nisha Bansal United States
André Lopes relative to Thomas Hébert France Thomas Hébert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Thomas Hébert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by André Lopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of André Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Lopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by André Lopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Lopes. The network helps show where André Lopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside André Lopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with André Lopes Line = papers co-authored together André Lopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199848
2 202225
3 201915
4 201914
5 201313
6 202113
7 201713
8 202011
9 20219
10 20238
11 20207
12 20197
13 20226
14 20245
15 20225
16 20224
17 20213
18 20203
19 20243
20 20183

About André Lopes

André Lopes is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (81 citations), Reproductive Medicine (81 citations), Oncology (83 citations), Surgery (97 citations) and Dermatology (14 citations). André Lopes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juan J. Nogueras, Ronaldo Lúcio Rangel Costa, K. A. Forde, Nissim Geron, Eric G. Weiss, Steven D. Wexner, Levon Badiglian‐Filho, Cristina Antón, Audrey Tieko Tsunoda and Glauco Baiocchi. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Clinical Breast Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact