André Casajus
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Economic and Fiscal Studies
-
- Game Theory and Applications
- Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Papers in
-
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 55
- Economic and Fiscal Studies 2
-
- Game Theory and Applications 9
- Co-authors
- Frank Huettner (15 shared papers)Sylvain Béal (6 shared papers)Philippe Solal (3 shared papers)Éric Rémila (3 shared papers)Andreas Tutić (2 shared papers)Yukihiko Funaki (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
André Casajus
60 papers receiving 683 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Economics and Econometrics 608
- Management Science and Operations Research 67
- Safety Research 25
- Finance 13
- Industrial relations 1
Countries citing papers authored by André Casajus
This map shows the geographic impact of André Casajus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Casajus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Casajus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by André Casajus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Casajus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Casajus. The network helps show where André Casajus may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside André Casajus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 13 |
About André Casajus
André Casajus is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 64 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (55 papers), Game Theory and Applications (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Economic and Fiscal Studies (2 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper) and Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (608 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (67 citations), Safety Research (25 citations), Finance (13 citations) and Industrial relations (1 citation). André Casajus has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Frank Huettner, Sylvain Béal, Philippe Solal, Éric Rémila, Andreas Tutić and Yukihiko Funaki. Their work appears in journals such as Economics Letters, International Journal of Game Theory, Theory and Decision, Mathematical Social Sciences and Journal of Economic Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.