Amy Scott-Thomas
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Endocrinology top 10%
- Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
Papers in
-
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 10
-
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 10
- Co-authors
- Stephen T. Chambers (24 shared papers)Michael Epton (8 shared papers)Mona Syhre (4 shared papers)John F. Pearson (3 shared papers)Richard Laing (1 shared paper)David R. Murdoch (8 shared papers)Philip Pattemore (1 shared paper)Malina Storer (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (4 papers)Journal of Breath Research (3 papers)Journal of Fungi (2 papers)Letters in Applied Microbiology (2 papers)Tuberculosis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandGermanyChina
In The Last Decade
Amy Scott-Thomas
24 papers receiving 493 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sensory Systems 59
- Endocrinology 57
- Biomedical Engineering 316
- Spectroscopy 94
- Molecular Medicine 19
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Scott-Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Scott-Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Scott-Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Scott-Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Scott-Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Scott-Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Scott-Thomas. The network helps show where Amy Scott-Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Scott-Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 120 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About Amy Scott-Thomas
Amy Scott-Thomas is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Biomedical Engineering, Endocrinology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (10 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (10 papers), Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (6 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers) and Vitamin K Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (59 citations), Endocrinology (57 citations), Biomedical Engineering (316 citations), Spectroscopy (94 citations) and Molecular Medicine (19 citations). Amy Scott-Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Chambers, Michael Epton, Mona Syhre, John F. Pearson, Richard Laing, David R. Murdoch, Philip Pattemore, Malina Storer, Jack Dummer and Maureen P. Swanney. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Breath Research, Journal of Fungi, Letters in Applied Microbiology and Tuberculosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.