Amy M Mitchell

810 citations
41 papers · 575 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Amy M Mitchell

32 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Amy M Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 210
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 46
  • Pharmacy 17
  • Cell Biology 62
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Marie-Ève Lavoie with:
Marie-Ève Lavoie Canada
Kathrin Scheuermann Germany
Marcelo Flores‐Opazo Chile
Monica L. Kearney United States
R. T. Fukui Brazil
Peter Aldiss United Kingdom
Kumail K. Motiani Finland
Morten Asp Vonsild Lund Denmark
Magda Bajzová Czechia
Maria Paola Canale Italy
Amy M Mitchell relative to Marie-Ève Lavoie Canada Marie-Ève Lavoie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.3×
Marie-Ève Lavoie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy M Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy M Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy M Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy M Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy M Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy M Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy M Mitchell. The network helps show where Amy M Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy M Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy M Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Amy M Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202288
2 200883
3 195678
4 195641
5 199139
6 202433
7 202131
8 202328
9 199017
10 200616
11 198914
12 202514
13 202213
14 202413
15 202311
16 199311
17 19917
18 20216
19 20256
20 20245

About Amy M Mitchell

Amy M Mitchell is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Biochemistry, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (23 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (2 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (2 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (210 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (46 citations), Pharmacy (17 citations), Cell Biology (62 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Amy M Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ruth M. Leverton, André La Gerche, Leah M. Wright, Erin J. Howden, Kristel Janssens, Lawrence Jay Cheskin, Rebecca A. Lewis, Lisa Davis, Thomas William Lycan and Guido Claessen. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, European Heart Journal, Circulation, Journal of Nutrition and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact