Amy E. Noser

1.6k citations
61 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Amy E. Noser

59 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Amy E. Noser
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Clinical Psychology 404
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 222
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
  • Social Psychology 186
Replace Nady Van Broeck with:
Nady Van Broeck Belgium
Nangel M. Lindberg United States
Ramesh Manocha Australia
Lis Raabæk Olsen Denmark
Kathryn Graff Low United States
Erin Hoare Australia
Paulomi M. Sudhir India
John C. Guare United States
Wendy Macdonald United Kingdom
Kirsten Hancock Australia
Amy E. Noser relative to Nady Van Broeck Belgium Nady Van Broeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nady Van Broeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Noser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Noser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Noser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Noser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Noser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Noser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Noser. The network helps show where Amy E. Noser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Noser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Noser Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Noser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018179
2 201686
3 201567
4 201566
5 201348
6 201545
7 201844
8 201437
9 201932
10 201531
11 201630
12 201425
13 201723
14 201823
15 201721
16 201321
17 201621
18 201621
19 202119
20 201718

About Amy E. Noser

Amy E. Noser is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (404 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (222 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations) and Social Psychology (186 citations). Amy E. Noser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Virgil Zeigler‐Hill, Susana R. Patton, Arwen M. Marker, Ric G. Steele, Mark A. Clements, Lindsay Huffhines, Sterett H. Mercer, Shideh Majidi, Avi Besser and Jennifer Vonk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Pediatric Diabetes, Personality and Individual Differences, Pediatric Pulmonology and Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact