Amy E. Hinks

1.4k citations
19 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Amy E. Hinks

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Amy E. Hinks
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ecology 512
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 274
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 138
  • Ecological Modeling 27
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 104
Replace Alejandro Grajal with:
Alejandro Grajal United States
Richard Buchholz United States
Steven B. Castleberry United States
Colleen M. Begg South Africa
Laura R. Bidner United States
Olivier Langrand United States
Christoph Schwitzer United Kingdom
Sérgio Lucena Mendes Brazil
Miguel de Guinea United States
Kathy Traylor‐Holzer United States
Amy E. Hinks relative to Alejandro Grajal United States Alejandro Grajal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Alejandro Grajal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Hinks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Hinks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Hinks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Hinks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Hinks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Hinks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Hinks. The network helps show where Amy E. Hinks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Hinks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Hinks Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Hinks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2012206
2 2015185
3 2017129
4 201391
5 201578
6 201575
7 201773
8 201770
9 201042
10 201336
11 201729
12 201928
13 201721
14 201717
15 202212
16 201311
17 201811
18 202310
19
The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey, determinants of success and key conservation threats
20163

About Amy E. Hinks

Amy E. Hinks is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Animal Law and Welfare (1 paper) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (512 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (274 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (138 citations), Ecological Modeling (27 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (104 citations). Amy E. Hinks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include David Whyte Macdonald, Dawn Burnham, Amy Dickman, Ewan A. Macdonald, Ella F. Cole, John L. Quinn, Julie Morand‐Ferron, Ben C. Sheldon, Yadvinder Singh Malhi and Teddy A. Wilkin. Their work appears in journals such as Global Ecology and Conservation, Biological Conservation, Folia Primatologica, Ecography and Nature Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact