Amy Dawson

570 citations
12 papers · 292 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Dawson

12 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Amy Dawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Reproductive Medicine 160
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 54
  • Cancer Research 35
  • Oncology 58
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 34
Replace Daniel L. Spitz with:
Daniel L. Spitz United States
Monica Dandapani United States
Nizar Hami Netherlands
Stefanie Schrauwen Belgium
Gunjal Garg United States
Leopold Garnar-Wortzel United States
G. Bruni Italy
Yibin Lin China
C. Whalen United States
Amy Dawson relative to Daniel L. Spitz United States Daniel L. Spitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Daniel L. Spitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Dawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Dawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Dawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Dawson. The network helps show where Amy Dawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Dawson Line = papers co-authored together Amy Dawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201878
2 201649
3
Differences in MEK inhibitor efficacy in molecularly characterized low-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines.
201633
4 202128
5 202028
6 201927
7 202215
8 201613
9 202211
10 20255
11
Microfluidics : the fur-free way towards personalised medicine in cancer therapy
20164
12 20171

About Amy Dawson

Amy Dawson is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (160 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (54 citations), Cancer Research (35 citations), Oncology (58 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (34 citations). Amy Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Marta Llauradó Fernández, Mark Carey, Michael S. Anglesio, Paul J. Yong, John Greenman, Gabriel E. DiMattia, M. Jacobsen, J. Davies, Charlotte E. Dyer and John Macfie. Their work appears in journals such as Biomicrofluidics, Cancer Cell International, Gynecologic Oncology, npj Precision Oncology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact