Amy Cooper

15 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Amy Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Social Psychology 168
  • Clinical Psychology 148
  • General Health Professions 82
  • Health 23
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 29
Replace Lindsey M. Nichols with:
Lindsey M. Nichols United States
K. Jessica Van Vliet Canada
Jennifer M. Staples United States
Apu Chakraborty Canada
Noelia Fernández-Rouco Spain
Amy M. Green United States
Jillian London United Kingdom
Ana Isabel Guillén Spain
Jon Larson United States
David D. Law United States
Amy Cooper relative to Lindsey M. Nichols United States Lindsey M. Nichols's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lindsey M. Nichols · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Cooper. The network helps show where Amy Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Amy Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003195
2 200426
3
200325
4 201519
5 201414
6 201511
7 20226
8 20066
9 20116
10
Lawyers' attitudes toward involuntary treatment.
20065
11 20223
12 20252
13
To centralise or decentralise? An e-government perspective
20131
14 20171
15 20191
16 20240
17 20250
18 20220
19 20190
20 20170

About Amy Cooper

Amy Cooper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Cuban History and Society (2 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (168 citations), Clinical Psychology (148 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations), Health (23 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations). Amy Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Patrick W. Corrigan, Amy C. Watson, Patricia Hanrahan, Daniel J. Luchins, Kenneth A. Rasinski, Michelle David, Sarath Kodagoda, Denis Burnham, Damith Herath and Sarah McKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Annals of Anthropological Practice, American Ethnologist, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact