Amina El‐Nemer

22 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Amina El‐Nemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 127
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 72
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 66
  • Sensory Systems 11
  • Safety Research 17
Replace Rachel Westfall with:
Rachel Westfall Canada
Reyna Sámano Mexico
Chrispin Mandiwa Malawi
Ryan Treffers United States
Khadije Bazrafshan Iran
Zahra Yazdanpanahi Iran
Tomas Yeheyis Ethiopia
O M Ebuehi Nigeria
Heather Grimes Australia
Amina El‐Nemer relative to Rachel Westfall Canada Rachel Westfall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Rachel Westfall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina El‐Nemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina El‐Nemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina El‐Nemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina El‐Nemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina El‐Nemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina El‐Nemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina El‐Nemer. The network helps show where Amina El‐Nemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Amina El‐Nemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina El‐Nemer Line = papers co-authored together Amina El‐Nemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201368
2 200560
3 201553
4 201727
5 201124
6 201721
7 201819
8
Effect of Implementing A Birth Plan on Womens' Childbirth Experiences and Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes
201513
9 20226
10 20154
11 20163
12 20182
13 20092
14 20182
15 20191
16 20251
17 20161
18 20151
19 20211
20 20201

About Amina El‐Nemer

Amina El‐Nemer is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (127 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (72 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (66 citations), Sensory Systems (11 citations) and Safety Research (17 citations). Amina El‐Nemer has collaborated with scholars based in Egypt, Lebanon and Syria. Frequent co-authors include Tamar Kabakian‐Khasholian, Hyam Bashour, Soo Downe, Neil Small, Mayada Kharouf, Anayda Portela, Rabih Chahine, Maged El‐Setouhy, Nabil J. Awadalla and Henry Silverman. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive Health Matters, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Social Science & Medicine, BMC Nursing and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact