Ami Hommel

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ami Hommel
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Occupational Therapy 278
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 130
  • Surgery 809
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 55
  • Rehabilitation 81
Replace Michael Stenvall with:
Michael Stenvall Sweden
C H Rapin Switzerland
Jan Tidermark Sweden
Kojiro Morita Japan
C. Gene Cayten United States
Anne Eskes Netherlands
Christoph Röder Switzerland
Evelyn Hutt United States
Marike van der Schaaf Netherlands
Romke van Balen Netherlands
Ami Hommel relative to Michael Stenvall Sweden Michael Stenvall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.4×
Michael Stenvall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Hommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Hommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Hommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Hommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Hommel. The network helps show where Ami Hommel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ami Hommel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ami Hommel Line = papers co-authored together Ami Hommel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010134
2 2008128
3 2002125
4 201788
5 201285
6 200878
7 201361
8
Factors at admission associated with 4 months outcome in elderly patients with hip fracture.
200953
9 200748
10 201844
11 200541
12 200336
13 201635
14 201535
15 201832
16 201828
17 201628
18 201628
19 201228
20 201923

About Ami Hommel

Ami Hommel is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Occupational Therapy, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (34 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (15 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (5 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (278 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (130 citations), Surgery (809 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (55 citations) and Rehabilitation (81 citations). Ami Hommel has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl–Göran Thorngren, Karin Björkman Björkelund, Carina Bååth, Lena Gunningberg, Hans Wingstrand, Kerstin Ulander, Ewa Idvall, K.‐G. Thorngren, D. Lundberg and S. Larsson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, Injury, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact