Ami Hommel

70 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ami Hommel
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Occupational Therapy 298
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 149
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 74
  • Surgery 874
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 111
Replace Paolo Chiari with:
Paolo Chiari Italy
Rik Th. Gerritsen Netherlands
Michael Stenvall Sweden
Louise Sewell United Kingdom
Jack Bell Australia
C H Rapin Switzerland
Merrilyn Banks Australia
Jan Tidermark Sweden
Kojiro Morita Japan
Kellie A. Stockton Australia
Ami Hommel relative to Paolo Chiari Italy Paolo Chiari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Paolo Chiari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Hommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Hommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Hommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Hommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Hommel. The network helps show where Ami Hommel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ami Hommel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ami Hommel Line = papers co-authored together Ami Hommel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010148
2 2008130
3 2002125
4 201796
5 201286
6 200884
7 201363
8
Factors at admission associated with 4 months outcome in elderly patients with hip fracture.
200953
9 201852
10 200749
11 200542
12 201538
13 201836
14 201636
15 200334
16 201833
17 201230
18 201630
19 201629
20 201926

About Ami Hommel

Ami Hommel is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (36 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (15 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (12 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (6 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (5 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (298 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (149 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (74 citations), Surgery (874 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (111 citations). Ami Hommel has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl–Göran Thorngren, Karin Björkman Björkelund, Carina Bååth, Lena Gunningberg, Hans Wingstrand, Kerstin Ulander, Ewa Idvall, K.‐G. Thorngren, S. Larsson and Daniel Lundberg. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, Injury, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact