Amber Moore

31 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Amber Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 74
  • Emergency Medical Services 30
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
Replace Ilona Roušalová with:
Ilona Roušalová Czechia
Agnes N. Anarado Nigeria
Carmen Tzanno‐Martins Brazil
Julie Houle Canada
Hamdi Almaramhy Saudi Arabia
Jorge Vinícius Cestari Félix Brazil
Brian Graves United States
Gert Laekeman Belgium
Rita Dale United States
Toshihiko Hasegawa Japan
Amber Moore relative to Ilona Roušalová Czechia Ilona Roušalová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Ilona Roušalová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Moore. The network helps show where Amber Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Moore Line = papers co-authored together Amber Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200879
2 201445
3 201737
4 200936
5 201634
6 201327
7 202021
8 201719
9 201914
10 201613
11 201012
12 201210
13 20207
14 20137
15 20216
16 20215
17 20225
18 20124
19
Principles of patient management
20044
20 20124

About Amber Moore

Amber Moore is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (3 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (2 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (8 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (74 citations), Emergency Medical Services (30 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations). Amber Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kylie O’Brien, David Dawson, P. Hartley, Alan Bensoussan, Lewis A. Lipsitz, Alison Evans, Helen Zorbas, S. Begbie, Karen Luxford and Margaret Hayden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hospital Medicine, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact