Amara Malik

646 citations
44 papers · 449 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Amara Malik

40 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Amara Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Library and Information Sciences 102
  • Communication 74
  • Information Systems and Management 47
  • Information Systems 124
  • Health 21
Replace Christine L. Yates with:
Christine L. Yates Australia
Barbara Anne Sen United Kingdom
Lorri M. Mon United States
Gaby Haddow Australia
Sharon A. Weiner United States
Lisa G. O’Connor United States
Lisa A. Ennis United States
Midrar Ullah Pakistan
Laurel Anne Clyde Iceland
Melissa A. Adler United States
Amara Malik relative to Christine L. Yates Australia Christine L. Yates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Christine L. Yates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amara Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amara Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amara Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amara Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amara Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amara Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amara Malik. The network helps show where Amara Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Amara Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amara Malik Line = papers co-authored together Amara Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202154
2 200442
3 202138
4 200229
5 202224
6
Web search behavior of university students: a case study at University of the Punjab
200921
7 202320
8 202119
9 201316
10 202016
11 201314
12 201814
13 202213
14 202212
15 202210
16 20179
17 20219
18 20209
19 20228
20 20207

About Amara Malik

Amara Malik is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Communication, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (14 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers), Library Science and Administration (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (102 citations), Communication (74 citations), Information Systems and Management (47 citations), Information Systems (124 citations) and Health (21 citations). Amara Malik has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Khalid M. Mahmood, Kanwal Ameen, Talat Islam, Tracy Lynn Hull, Iqra Bashir, Nosheen Fatima Warraich, Crina V. Floruta, Arslan Sheikh, Syeda Hina Batool and Muhammad Asif Naveed. Their work appears in journals such as Information Development, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Library Review, portal Libraries and the Academy and Library Hi Tech.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact