Amanda E. Goodman
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
Papers in
-
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 9
-
- Vibrio bacteria research studies 6
- Co-authors
- Staffan J. Kjelleberg (7 shared papers)K. C. Marshall (6 shared papers)Somkiet Techkarnjanaruk (5 shared papers)Serina Stretton (5 shared papers)Peter L. Rogers (8 shared papers)Mary L. Skotnicki (1 shared paper)Jörgen Östling (1 shared paper)Gill G. Geesey (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biotechnology (6 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (5 papers)Biofouling (3 papers)FEMS Microbiology Ecology (3 papers)The ISME Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amanda E. Goodman
44 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Endocrinology 124
- Biotechnology 148
- Ecology 370
- Periodontics 51
- Molecular Biology 734
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda E. Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda E. Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda E. Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda E. Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda E. Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda E. Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda E. Goodman. The network helps show where Amanda E. Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda E. Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 112 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 83 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 72 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 43 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 42 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 40 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 36 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 26 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 16 |
About Amanda E. Goodman
Amanda E. Goodman is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (10 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (9 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (9 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (8 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (7 papers), Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases (6 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (6 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (124 citations), Biotechnology (148 citations), Ecology (370 citations), Periodontics (51 citations) and Molecular Biology (734 citations). Amanda E. Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Staffan J. Kjelleberg, K. C. Marshall, Somkiet Techkarnjanaruk, Serina Stretton, Peter L. Rogers, Mary L. Skotnicki, Jörgen Östling, Gill G. Geesey, Nicholas C. McClure and Catherine E. Dandie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biotechnology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Biofouling, FEMS Microbiology Ecology and The ISME Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.