Amanda C Collins

495 citations
30 papers · 253 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda C Collins

27 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Amanda C Collins
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Clinical Psychology 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
Replace D. Gage Jordan with:
D. Gage Jordan United States
Hannah G. Bosley United States
Sanne J. E. Bruijniks Netherlands
Peter D. Soyster United States
Brage Kraft Norway
Nicola S. Klein Netherlands
Cristal E. Weeks United States
Alessandro Pompoli Italy
Neil Nixon United Kingdom
Amanda C Collins relative to D. Gage Jordan United States D. Gage Jordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
D. Gage Jordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda C Collins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda C Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda C Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda C Collins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda C Collins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda C Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda C Collins. The network helps show where Amanda C Collins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda C Collins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda C Collins Line = papers co-authored together Amanda C Collins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201950
2 202031
3 202424
4 202121
5 202017
6 202314
7 202312
8 202311
9 202211
10 20238
11 20237
12 20246
13 20245
14 20225
15 20234
16 20234
17 20233
18 20253
19 20243
20 20233

About Amanda C Collins

Amanda C Collins is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (17 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (61 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations). Amanda C Collins has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include E. Samuel Winer, D. Gage Jordan, Nicholas C. Jacobson, George Price, Michael V. Heinz, Damien Lekkas, Paul D. Rokke, Andrew T. Campbell, Matthew D. Nemesure and Subigya Nepal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, PLoS ONE, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact