Amada Armenta
Impact in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Migration, Health and Trauma
Papers in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 5
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 4
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 4
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 3
-
- Policing Practices and Perceptions 5
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 2
- Co-authors
- Katharine M. Donato (2 shared papers)Forrest Stuart (1 shared paper)Melissa Osborne (1 shared paper)Chizuko Wakabayashi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Work and Occupations (1 paper)American Behavioral Scientist (1 paper)Annual Review of Law and Social Science (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amada Armenta
13 papers receiving 694 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 704
- Clinical Psychology 309
- Political Science and International Relations 185
- Public Administration 23
- General Health Professions 170
Countries citing papers authored by Amada Armenta
This map shows the geographic impact of Amada Armenta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amada Armenta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amada Armenta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amada Armenta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amada Armenta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amada Armenta. The network helps show where Amada Armenta may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Amada Armenta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 187 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 0 |
About Amada Armenta
Amada Armenta is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (704 citations), Clinical Psychology (309 citations), Political Science and International Relations (185 citations), Public Administration (23 citations) and General Health Professions (170 citations). Amada Armenta has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Katharine M. Donato, Forrest Stuart, Melissa Osborne and Chizuko Wakabayashi. Their work appears in journals such as Work and Occupations, American Behavioral Scientist, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.