A.M. Wright
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
- Surgery 5
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 2
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
- Spinal Hematomas and Complications 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 4
- Co-authors
- Ji Young Park (1 shared paper)David Needham (1 shared paper)Jihong Tong (1 shared paper)Stephen R. Turnock (3 shared papers)Stephen Eustace (1 shared paper)David T. Felson (1 shared paper)Douglas P. Kiel (1 shared paper)Leena I. Kauppila (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spine (3 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1 paper)Marine Structures (1 paper)Faraday Discussions (1 paper)Journal of Fluids and Structures (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
A.M. Wright
12 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Internal Medicine 74
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 130
- Biomaterials 81
- Surgery 197
- Pharmacology 63
Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Wright. The network helps show where A.M. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside A.M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 103 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 42 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 33 | |
| 6 | Cervical myelopathy attributable to pseudogout. Case report with radiologic, histologic, and crystallographic observations. | 1987 | 29 |
| 7 | 2000 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 10 | A comparison of Computational Methods for Planing Craft Hydrodynamics | 2001 | 3 |
| 11 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 |
About A.M. Wright
A.M. Wright is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Internal Medicine and Ocean Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability (2 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (2 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (74 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (130 citations), Biomaterials (81 citations), Surgery (197 citations) and Pharmacology (63 citations). A.M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ji Young Park, David Needham, Jihong Tong, Stephen R. Turnock, Stephen Eustace, David T. Felson, Douglas P. Kiel, Leena I. Kauppila, William J. Landis and Károly Balogh. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Marine Structures, Faraday Discussions and Journal of Fluids and Structures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.