Alspac Study Team

8 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Alspac Study Team
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Otorhinolaryngology 34
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 93
  • Emergency Medicine 38
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 98
  • Clinical Psychology 58
Replace Daniel Sacks with:
Daniel Sacks United States
Alan Regenberg United States
Dawn C. Roberts United States
Tuomo Määttä Finland
Alison Warburton United Kingdom
Meera Rayar Canada
Nesrin Ergin Türkiye
Osman Çelbiş Türkiye
Lauren S. H. Chong Australia
Francesca Romito Italy
Alspac Study Team relative to Daniel Sacks United States Daniel Sacks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Daniel Sacks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alspac Study Team

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alspac Study Team's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alspac Study Team with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alspac Study Team more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alspac Study Team

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alspac Study Team. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alspac Study Team. The network helps show where Alspac Study Team may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Alspac Study Team, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alspac Study Team Line = papers co-authored together Alspac Study Team links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2001107
2 200072
3
Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children
200353
4 200053
5 199833
6
Amblyopia treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years
20027
7 19974
8
Screening for amblyopia in preschool children
20012

About Alspac Study Team

Alspac Study Team is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (34 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (93 citations), Emergency Medicine (38 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (98 citations) and Clinical Psychology (58 citations). Alspac Study Team has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include C. M Wright, Jean Golding, Thomas G. O’Connor, Jon Heron, Vivette Glover, A. Richard Maw, Linda Tyfield, Richard W. Jones, Susan M. Ring and Renata M. J. Hamvas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, European Journal of Human Genetics, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Ophthalmic Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact