Aline Mendes

24 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Aline Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Neurology 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 58
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5
Replace Francesca Ciciarello with:
Francesca Ciciarello Italy
Cristina Pais Italy
Amra Sakusic United States
Alessia Antonella Galbussera Italy
José‐Manuel León‐Ramírez Spain
Ilaria Prince Italy
Esther Ewalds Netherlands
Camilo Corbellini Italy
Robert Shaw United Kingdom
Cynthia Putri Indonesia
Aline Mendes relative to Francesca Ciciarello Italy Francesca Ciciarello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Francesca Ciciarello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aline Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aline Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aline Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aline Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aline Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aline Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aline Mendes. The network helps show where Aline Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aline Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aline Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Aline Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202093
2 202135
3 201931
4 202127
5 201824
6 201723
7 202121
8 202121
9 202011
10 201611
11 20218
12 20216
13 20215
14 20204
15 20224
16 20244
17 20223
18 20243
19 20233
20 20202

About Aline Mendes

Aline Mendes is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Physiology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Neurology (74 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (58 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations). Aline Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Dina Zekry, François R. Herrmann, Christophe Graf, J. Serratrice, Samuel Périvier, Laurence Genton, Max Scheffler, Virginie Prendki, Philippe Huber and Xavier Roux. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Alzheimer s & Dementia, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact