Alicia Mathis

4.0k citations
79 papers · 3.1k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Alicia Mathis

78 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Alicia Mathis
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
  • Developmental Biology 152
  • Ecological Modeling 193
Replace Gábor Herczeg with:
Gábor Herczeg Hungary
Brian D. Wisenden United States
Martine E. Maan Netherlands
Reehan S. Mirza Canada
Paul A. Verrell United States
Anne E. Houde United States
Patrick S. Fitze Spain
Ben B. Chapman Sweden
Jeffrey S. McKinnon United States
Caitlin R. Gabor United States
Alicia Mathis relative to Gábor Herczeg Hungary Gábor Herczeg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gábor Herczeg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alicia Mathis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alicia Mathis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alicia Mathis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alicia Mathis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alicia Mathis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alicia Mathis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alicia Mathis. The network helps show where Alicia Mathis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alicia Mathis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alicia Mathis Line = papers co-authored together Alicia Mathis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993231
2 1993192
3 1996178
4 2002158
5 1991146
6 1990143
7 1993123
8 2008103
9 1995102
10 200098
11 199388
12 199386
13 200381
14 199874
15 199068
16 198966
17 199262
18 200660
19 200957
20 200455

About Alicia Mathis

Alicia Mathis is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (62 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (50 papers), Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (21 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations), Developmental Biology (152 citations) and Ecological Modeling (193 citations). Alicia Mathis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include R. J. F. Smith, Douglas P. Chivers, Adam L. Crane, Robert F. Wilkinson, Caleb R. Hickman, Brian G. Gall, Kevin L. Murray, Maud C. O. Ferrari, W. Wyatt Hoback and Reehan S. Mirza. Their work appears in journals such as Ethology, Animal Behaviour, Copeia, Behaviour and Journal of Fish Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact