Alfred Lit
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 14
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
- Ocular and Laser Science Research 3
- Co-authors
- John Williams (1 shared paper)Robert H. Young (3 shared papers)William O. Dwyer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Optometry and Vision Science (3 papers)Vision Research (3 papers)The American Journal of Psychology (2 papers)Journal of the Optical Society of America (8 papers)Perception & Psychophysics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alfred Lit
20 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 264
- Ophthalmology 55
- Media Technology 25
- Epidemiology 64
- Social Psychology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Alfred Lit
This map shows the geographic impact of Alfred Lit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alfred Lit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alfred Lit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alfred Lit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alfred Lit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alfred Lit. The network helps show where Alfred Lit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Alfred Lit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 58 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1951 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1976 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1959 | 15 | |
| 11 | Simple reaction time as a function of luminance for various wavelengths | 1971 | 12 |
| 12 | 1960 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1960 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1959 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1964 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1966 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 |
About Alfred Lit
Alfred Lit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 22 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (3 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (264 citations), Ophthalmology (55 citations), Media Technology (25 citations), Epidemiology (64 citations) and Social Psychology (40 citations). Alfred Lit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Williams, Robert H. Young and William O. Dwyer. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Vision Research, The American Journal of Psychology, Journal of the Optical Society of America and Perception & Psychophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.