Alexandra Schepansky

24 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers

Alexandra Schepansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 138
  • Oncology 288
  • Reproductive Medicine 104
  • Epidemiology 198
  • Cancer Research 41
Replace Giuseppe Scaletta with:
Giuseppe Scaletta Italy
Chiara Cassani Italy
Sefa Kurt Türkiye
Yanpeng Wang China
L. Giannikos Greece
Herbert Gretz United States
Amy Morrison United Kingdom
Nuri Yıldırım Türkiye
ANNIKA JEPPSSON Sweden
Alexandra Schepansky relative to Giuseppe Scaletta Italy Giuseppe Scaletta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Giuseppe Scaletta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Schepansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Schepansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Schepansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Schepansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Schepansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Schepansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Schepansky. The network helps show where Alexandra Schepansky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexandra Schepansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexandra Schepansky Line = papers co-authored together Alexandra Schepansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010223
2 200792
3 200990
4 200984
5 200682
6 201272
7 200266
8 200246
9 200945
10
The natural history of CIN I lesions.
199844
11 200641
12 201335
13 200518
14 201317
15 201115
16
A paired comparison of dot blot hybridization and PCR amplification for HPV testing of cervical scrapes interpreted as CIN 1.
199411
17 200410
18 201010
19 19928
20
The HPV determinants of CIN I.
19975

About Alexandra Schepansky

Alexandra Schepansky is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Oncology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (1 paper), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (1 paper) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (138 citations), Oncology (288 citations), Reproductive Medicine (104 citations), Epidemiology (198 citations) and Cancer Research (41 citations). Alexandra Schepansky has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Valerie A. Capstick, Helen L. Steed, Wylam Faught, Jeffrey K. Vallance, Kerry S. Courneya, Aliya B. Ladha, Katia Sonia Tonkin, Clare D. Stevinson, Tiffany H. Wells and Kelly Dabbs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact