Alexandra Schepansky

24 papers receiving 967 citations

Peers

Alexandra Schepansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 162
  • Reproductive Medicine 109
  • Oncology 274
  • Epidemiology 193
  • Cancer Research 79
Replace Valerie Capstick with:
Valerie Capstick Canada
Carrie M. Cottreau United States
Cher M. Dallal United States
Xiaming Liu China
Jafaru Abu United Kingdom
Naoko Sasamoto United States
Tomasz Kluz Poland
Yanming Wu China
H. Franke Netherlands
Alexandra Schepansky relative to Valerie Capstick Canada Valerie Capstick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Valerie Capstick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Schepansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Schepansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Schepansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Schepansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Schepansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Schepansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Schepansky. The network helps show where Alexandra Schepansky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexandra Schepansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexandra Schepansky Line = papers co-authored together Alexandra Schepansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010217
2 200793
3 200988
4 200983
5 200681
6 200268
7 201267
8 200245
9 200944
10 200641
11
The natural history of CIN I lesions.
199841
12 201335
13 201318
14 200518
15 201114
16 200412
17
A paired comparison of dot blot hybridization and PCR amplification for HPV testing of cervical scrapes interpreted as CIN 1.
199411
18 201010
19 19928
20
The HPV determinants of CIN I.
19975

About Alexandra Schepansky

Alexandra Schepansky is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (162 citations), Reproductive Medicine (109 citations), Oncology (274 citations), Epidemiology (193 citations) and Cancer Research (79 citations). Alexandra Schepansky has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Valerie Capstick, Helen Steed, Wylam Faught, Kerry S. Courneya, Clare Stevinson, Jeffrey K. Vallance, Aliya B. Ladha, Katia Tonkin, Tiffany Wells and Carolyn M. Slupsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research and Journal of Physical Activity and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact