Alexander Pott

2.7k citations
83 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Pott

81 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Alexander Pott
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 382
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.2k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.1k
  • Geometry and Topology 119
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 201
Replace Hans Dobbertin with:
Hans Dobbertin Germany
Gary McGuire Ireland
Victor Zinoviev Russia
Ferruh Özbudak Türkiye
Xiwang Cao China
Longjiang Qu China
Vladimir D. Tonchev United States
Wilfried Meidl Austria
Sihem Mesnager France
Nian Li China
Alexander Pott relative to Hans Dobbertin Germany Hans Dobbertin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hans Dobbertin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Pott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Pott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Pott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Pott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Pott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Pott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Pott. The network helps show where Alexander Pott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Pott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Pott Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Pott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995168
2 2006127
3 200988
4 200670
5 199959
6 200359
7 200957
8 201547
9 199546
10 201240
11 200238
12 199932
13 199529
14 201329
15 201129
16 199024
17 201323
18 201323
19 201018
20 199416

About Alexander Pott

Alexander Pott is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (69 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (66 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (26 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (7 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (6 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (6 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (5 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (382 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.2k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.1k citations), Geometry and Topology (119 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (201 citations). Alexander Pott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Yves Edel, Dieter Jungnickel, Claude Carlet, Lilya Budaghyan, K. T. Arasu, Wilfried Meidl, Gohar Kyureghyan, Yue Zhou, Ayça Çeşmelioğlu and Tao Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Designs Codes and Cryptography, Discrete Mathematics, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A and Cryptography and Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact