Alexander Mook

1.9k citations
37 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Mook

36 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Alexander Mook
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Condensed Matter Physics 824
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 370
  • Materials Chemistry 198
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2
Replace Jacob Gayles with:
Jacob Gayles Germany
Chunyu Guo China
Fanghang Yu China
S.-Y. Xu United States
Ai Yamakage Japan
Eszter Simon Hungary
Aiji Liang China
Chiara Ciccarelli United Kingdom
Muhammad Ikhlas Japan
Angelo Di Bernardo Germany
Alexander Mook relative to Jacob Gayles Germany Jacob Gayles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jacob Gayles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Mook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Mook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Mook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Mook. The network helps show where Alexander Mook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Mook Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Mook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014180
2 2014152
3 2019135
4 2017119
5 2016100
6 201957
7 201950
8 201749
9 202449
10 201740
11 202033
12 201930
13 202129
14 201629
15 201927
16 201526
17 201726
18 201823
19 201523
20 202321

About Alexander Mook

Alexander Mook is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (20 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (19 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (19 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (11 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers) and Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (824 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (370 citations), Materials Chemistry (198 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 citations). Alexander Mook has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Henk, Ingrid Mertig, Börge Göbel, Oleg A. Tretiakov, Libor Šmejkal, Johannes Knolle, Jelena Klinovaja, Daniel Loss, Sebastián A. Díaz and Alexey A. Kovalev. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Reports on Progress in Physics and PRX Quantum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact