Alexander Day

5.0k citations
78 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Day

70 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Alexander Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 919
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 552
  • Epidemiology 185
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
Replace José Ignacio Fernández‐Vigo with:
José Ignacio Fernández‐Vigo Spain
Brijesh Takkar India
Reza Mirshahi Iran
Alireza Mirshahi Germany
Alain Saad France
Muhittin Taşkapılı Türkiye
Jiangnan He China
Sanford M. Meyers United States
G. Atma Vemulakonda United States
Thomas C. Kreutzer Germany
Alexander Day relative to José Ignacio Fernández‐Vigo Spain José Ignacio Fernández‐Vigo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
José Ignacio Fernández‐Vigo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Day. The network helps show where Alexander Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Day Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015248
2 2012128
3 201696
4 201665
5 201256
6 201853
7 201449
8 201744
9 201943
10 201943
11 201637
12 200736
13 201636
14 201336
15 201235
16
A detailed phenotypic assessment of individuals affected by MFRP-related oculopathy.
201034
17 202033
18 201632
19 201528
20 201127

About Alexander Day

Alexander Day is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (919 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (552 citations), Epidemiology (185 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations). Alexander Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Julian D. Stevens, Paul H. J. Donachie, J M Sparrow, Robert L. Johnston, Catey Bunce, Paul J. Foster, Jennifer Evans, Vincenzo Maurino, Daniel M. Gore and Bruce Allan. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Open and Journal of Refractive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact