Alexander Bach

856 citations
45 papers · 568 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Bach

42 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Alexander Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 243
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 320
  • History and Philosophy of Science 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 66
  • Artificial Intelligence 159
Replace H. S. Green with:
H. S. Green Australia
Elihu Lubkin United States
G. Morandi Italy
Alwyn van der Merwe United States
G. N. Ord Canada
Andreas S. Kronfeld United States
Gert Roepstorff Germany
A. Loinger Italy
Taksu Cheon Japan
Stefan Teufel Germany
Alexander Bach relative to H. S. Green Australia H. S. Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
H. S. Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Bach. The network helps show where Alexander Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Bach Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978102
2 197552
3 197451
4 199847
5 199036
6 198028
7 199721
8 198620
9 198519
10 198815
11 197915
12 198114
13 197713
14 198512
15 198511
16 198410
17 19828
18 19877
19 19987
20 19857

About Alexander Bach

Alexander Bach is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (25 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (22 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (14 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (9 papers), Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques (5 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (4 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers) and Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (243 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (320 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (66 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (159 citations). Alexander Bach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Detlef Dürr, Werner Horsthemke, D. Dürr, Luigi Accardi, Christoph Langhammer, G. R. Stewart, R. Helfrich, F. Steglich, Detlef D�rr and Maik Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, The European Physical Journal B, Europhysics Letters (EPL), Letters in Mathematical Physics and Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact