Alexander Bach

865 citations
50 papers · 652 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Bach

47 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Alexander Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 272
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 364
  • History and Philosophy of Science 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 73
  • Mathematical Physics 50
Replace H. S. Green with:
H. S. Green Australia
G. N. Ord Canada
C.D. Froggatt United Kingdom
Alwyn van der Merwe United States
Alberto Barchielli Italy
D. Merlini Switzerland
Gert Roepstorff Germany
Andreas S. Kronfeld United States
Elihu Lubkin United States
Jim Napolitano United States
Alexander Bach relative to H. S. Green Australia H. S. Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
H. S. Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Bach. The network helps show where Alexander Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Bach Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978112
2 197457
3 197554
4 199851
5 199039
6 198029
7 198624
8 199724
9 198522
10 198819
11 198516
12 197915
13 198114
14 197714
15 198913
16 198512
17 198411
18 19829
19 19909
20 19988

About Alexander Bach

Alexander Bach is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (28 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (24 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (16 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (10 papers), Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques (5 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (4 papers) and Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (272 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (364 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (73 citations) and Mathematical Physics (50 citations). Alexander Bach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Detlef Dürr, Werner Horsthemke, Luigi Accardi, D. Dürr, R. Helfrich, G. R. Stewart, F. Steglich, Christoph Langhammer, Detlef D�rr and J. S. Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, The European Physical Journal B, Letters in Mathematical Physics, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact