Alex Danchev

1.1k citations
54 papers · 347 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Alex Danchev

49 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Alex Danchev
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Political Science and International Relations 142
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 159
  • History 29
  • Urban Studies 14
Replace Rob Kroes with:
Rob Kroes Netherlands
Ian Angus Canada
Enzo Traverso France
Sari Wastell United States
Ajantha Subramanian United States
Alexander Etkind United Kingdom
John Mack Faragher United States
Chiara Bottici United States
Susan Castillo India
Joseph W. Bendersky United States
Alex Danchev relative to Rob Kroes Netherlands Rob Kroes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Rob Kroes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alex Danchev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Danchev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Danchev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Danchev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Danchev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Danchev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Danchev. The network helps show where Alex Danchev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Alex Danchev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alex Danchev Line = papers co-authored together Alex Danchev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A SHORT HISTORY OF PROGRESS
200581
2 200931
3 200926
4 200616
5 199814
6 199611
7 199910
8 20058
9 19948
10 19968
11 20018
12 20068
13 20048
14
War diaries, 1939-1945
20017
15
HOPE IN THE DARK: The untold history of people power
20056
16 19946
17 19956
18 19996
19 20075
20
Very special relationship
19865

About Alex Danchev

Alex Danchev is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (3 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers), Military and Defense Studies (2 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (142 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (159 citations), History (29 citations) and Urban Studies (14 citations). Alex Danchev has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Debbie Lisle, Richard M. Swain, Thomas Halverson, Paul Fussell, Roger Adelson, Lawrence S. Kaplan, Alan F. Wilt and Gerhard Richter. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, The Journal of Military History, Review of International Studies, Alternatives Global Local Political and Intelligence & National Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact