Albrecht Poth

1.3k citations
21 papers · 470 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Albrecht Poth

21 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Albrecht Poth
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Cancer Research 196
  • Small Animals 89
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 163
  • Biophysics 29
  • Chemical Health and Safety 2
Replace Tatyana Y. Doktorova with:
Tatyana Y. Doktorova Belgium
Matthew Tate United Kingdom
Mick D. Fellows United Kingdom
Julia Kenny United Kingdom
Rodger Curren United States
Ulla Plappert‐Helbig Switzerland
Robert W. Rees United Kingdom
Gregory Akerman United States
Annett Janusch Roi Italy
Laura Jeffrey United Kingdom
Albrecht Poth relative to Tatyana Y. Doktorova Belgium Tatyana Y. Doktorova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Tatyana Y. Doktorova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Albrecht Poth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albrecht Poth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albrecht Poth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albrecht Poth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albrecht Poth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albrecht Poth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albrecht Poth. The network helps show where Albrecht Poth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Albrecht Poth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Albrecht Poth Line = papers co-authored together Albrecht Poth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017133
2 201167
3 200753
4 201132
5 201231
6 201129
7 201117
8 201217
9 201115
10 201112
11 201112
12 201111
13 20138
14 20218
15 20138
16 20215
17
Bhas42 cell transformation assay as a predictor of carcinogenicity
20085
18 20124
19 19941
20 20131

About Albrecht Poth

Albrecht Poth is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (12 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (9 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (8 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (196 citations), Small Animals (89 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (163 citations), Biophysics (29 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (2 citations). Albrecht Poth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Dietmar Utesch, Henning Hintzsche, Helga Stopper, Ulrike Hemmann, Noriho Tanaka, Ayako Sakai, Kamala Pant, Susan Salovaara, Kiyoshi Sasaki and Stefan Pfuhler. Their work appears in journals such as Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Mutagenesis, Toxicology in Vitro, Toxicology Letters and Alternatives to Laboratory Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact