Albert Hofmann

1.1k citations
11 papers · 677 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Albert Hofmann

10 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Albert Hofmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Clinical Psychology 441
  • Archeology 15
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 163
  • Toxicology 29
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 95
Replace R. Gordon Wasson with:
R. Gordon Wasson United States
Jonathan Ott Mexico
Luís Eduardo Luna Hungary
Jochen Gartz Germany
David Luke United Kingdom
Ralph Metzner United States
Ben Sessa United Kingdom
Peter T. Furst United States
Gastón Guzmán Mexico
Glacus S. Brito Brazil
Albert Hofmann relative to R. Gordon Wasson United States R. Gordon Wasson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
R. Gordon Wasson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Albert Hofmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Hofmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albert Hofmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Hofmann. The network helps show where Albert Hofmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Albert Hofmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Albert Hofmann Line = papers co-authored together Albert Hofmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers
1992293
2 1981107
3 1980107
4 197967
5
The Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Plants: Ethnopharmacology and Its Applications
200532
6 196331
7
LSD My Problem Child: Reflections on Sacred Drugs, Mysticism and Science
198330
8
LSD: My problem child and insights/outlooks.
20136
9 19992
10
Psychoactive Sacramentals: Essays on Entheogens and Religion
20011
11
LSD: Completely Personal
20101

About Albert Hofmann

Albert Hofmann is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Artificial Intelligence and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper), History and advancements in chemistry (1 paper), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (441 citations), Archeology (15 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (163 citations), Toxicology (29 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (95 citations). Frequent co-authors include Richard Evans Schultes, J. P. M. Brenan, Jonathan Ott, Amanda Feilding, Huston Smith and Stanislav Grof. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, Kew Bulletin, The Antioch Review, Journal of Psychedelic Drugs and Botanical Museum leaflets Harvard University.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact