Albert C. Mudry

116 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Albert C. Mudry
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Otorhinolaryngology 328
  • Anatomy 24
  • Sensory Systems 56
  • Neurology 131
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 176
Replace Geraldo Pereira Jotz with:
Geraldo Pereira Jotz Brazil
Maura K. Cosetti United States
Collin S. Karmody United States
Dennis G. Pappas United States
Chigako Uwabe Japan
Elias M. Michaelides United States
Edwin M. Monsell United States
Anthony F. Jahn United States
Bruce Proctor United States
F. Veillon France
Albert C. Mudry relative to Geraldo Pereira Jotz Brazil Geraldo Pereira Jotz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Geraldo Pereira Jotz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Albert C. Mudry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albert C. Mudry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert C. Mudry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert C. Mudry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albert C. Mudry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert C. Mudry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert C. Mudry. The network helps show where Albert C. Mudry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Albert C. Mudry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Albert C. Mudry Line = papers co-authored together Albert C. Mudry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013118
2 1996111
3 201356
4 201148
5 200836
6 200133
7 201128
8 200027
9 200926
10 200623
11
Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): skin healing process for skin flap technique versus linear incision technique in the first three months after the implantation.
200920
12 200819
13 202218
14 200017
15 202115
16 199914
17 202213
18 200611
19 201111
20 201411

About Albert C. Mudry

Albert C. Mudry is a scholar working on History, Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology, History and Philosophy of Science and Anatomy, having authored 135 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Innovations (62 papers), History of Medical Practice (45 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (34 papers), History of Science and Medicine (33 papers), History of Medicine Studies (27 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (12 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (8 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (328 citations), Anatomy (24 citations), Sensory Systems (56 citations), Neurology (131 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations). Albert C. Mudry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mara Mills, Anders M.R. Tjellström, Philippe Monnier, Wolfgang Pirsig, Robert K. Jackler, O. Laccourreye, Chris T. Bolliger, Franz Stanzel, Rudolf R. Probst and Markus Heitz. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact